The first correction that I have to make is the Efik translation, which renders locust, in our first lesson, as an insect of the grasshopper species. This is a blatant misrepresentation and misleading translation.
The right translation is the locust beans and not locust as an insect of the grasshopper species. An example of the bean is what I am holding up, which you should all look at.
If you argue that it is locust - grasshopper, does that not mean that John fed on animals? Because locust the insect is an animal.
If you argue that it is locust - grasshopper, does that not mean that John fed on animals? Because locust the insect is an animal.
If you argue that it is locust - grasshopper, does that not mean that John fed on animals? Because locust the insect is an animal.
If you argue that it is locust - grasshopper, does that not mean that John fed on animals? Because locust the insect is an animal.